Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32401 - 32410 of 63277 for records.
Search results 32401 - 32410 of 63277 for records.
State v. Henry E. Stothard
was going on around him were not impaired. On appeal, we examine the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11178 - 2005-03-31
was going on around him were not impaired. On appeal, we examine the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11178 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679184 - 2023-07-18
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679184 - 2023-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of Carley’s appeal, as the record initially showed that Carley had entered a no contest plea, by which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92582 - 2013-02-12
of Carley’s appeal, as the record initially showed that Carley had entered a no contest plea, by which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92582 - 2013-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144916 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144916 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
objectives enumerated.” However, the record belies his argument. ¶6 Here, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-08
objectives enumerated.” However, the record belies his argument. ¶6 Here, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-08
CA Blank Order
without prejudice and without costs. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97089 - 2013-05-21
without prejudice and without costs. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97089 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
Teresa L. v. Sauk County
that "[t]he record supports the circuit court's implied conclusion that just before he went to Florida
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8100 - 2017-09-19
that "[t]he record supports the circuit court's implied conclusion that just before he went to Florida
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8100 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott J. Bogdala
had on the victims without support for that assumption in the record. We disagree. Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6333 - 2005-03-31
had on the victims without support for that assumption in the record. We disagree. Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6333 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
record beyond the admittedly sparse appellate record before us. ¶4 Wisconsin Stat. § 302.11(7)(am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29965 - 2007-08-13
record beyond the admittedly sparse appellate record before us. ¶4 Wisconsin Stat. § 302.11(7)(am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29965 - 2007-08-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
“if we can independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49214 - 2014-09-15
“if we can independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49214 - 2014-09-15