Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32421 - 32430 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32421 - 32430 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 4, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 4, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
. Why a day and a half [to try the case to the court]? I mean, if we waive the jury trial in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2008-11-25
. Why a day and a half [to try the case to the court]? I mean, if we waive the jury trial in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2008-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92069 - 2013-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92069 - 2013-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
for his cooperation in this case. The trial court denied relief, finding that Lee was not a credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39043 - 2009-08-05
for his cooperation in this case. The trial court denied relief, finding that Lee was not a credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39043 - 2009-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS
minimum of six months in this case. And I feel as an officer of the Court, I’m obligated to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36112 - 2009-04-14
minimum of six months in this case. And I feel as an officer of the Court, I’m obligated to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36112 - 2009-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case supports the court’s placement determination. ¶19 Further, this court rejects Carl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93604 - 2013-03-04
in this case supports the court’s placement determination. ¶19 Further, this court rejects Carl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93604 - 2013-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
. If the record “indicates that the court examined the facts of the case and reasoned its way to a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29151 - 2007-05-21
. If the record “indicates that the court examined the facts of the case and reasoned its way to a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29151 - 2007-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of continuing CHIPS. Accordingly, I agree with the circuit court that in this case that JNOV on the continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123010 - 2014-10-01
of continuing CHIPS. Accordingly, I agree with the circuit court that in this case that JNOV on the continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123010 - 2014-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75193 - 2011-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75193 - 2011-12-18