Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32431 - 32440 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 32431 - 32440 of 58245 for speedy trial.
State v. Bruce M. Stevens
that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained after a “no-knock” entry of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12216 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained after a “no-knock” entry of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12216 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
asserts that evidence presented at trial showed that the arresting officer did not continuously observe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106014 - 2013-12-26
asserts that evidence presented at trial showed that the arresting officer did not continuously observe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106014 - 2013-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but the children had begun a trial reunification with Hughes in August 2017. Upon their removal from Hughes’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266392 - 2020-07-07
, but the children had begun a trial reunification with Hughes in August 2017. Upon their removal from Hughes’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266392 - 2020-07-07
[PDF]
Guadalupe Mendoya v. Brown County
to the jail, either for pre-trial detention or to serve a sentence, booking officer will, as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13909 - 2014-09-15
to the jail, either for pre-trial detention or to serve a sentence, booking officer will, as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13909 - 2014-09-15
State v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.
that: (1) the trial court did not err by refusing to stay the civil traffic proceedings; (2) not all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10426 - 2005-03-31
that: (1) the trial court did not err by refusing to stay the civil traffic proceedings; (2) not all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10426 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and erred in making evidentiary rulings at trial. Moss also argues that a new trial should be ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04
and erred in making evidentiary rulings at trial. Moss also argues that a new trial should be ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04
Thomas Kulekowskis and Sandra Kulekowskis v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company
the following issues for our review: (1) that the trial court failed to follow the appropriate procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10463 - 2005-03-31
the following issues for our review: (1) that the trial court failed to follow the appropriate procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10463 - 2005-03-31
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Motive Equipment, Inc.
and Diesel Division of General Motors of Canada (GM). Union Pacific contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21734 - 2006-04-25
and Diesel Division of General Motors of Canada (GM). Union Pacific contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21734 - 2006-04-25
[PDF]
Thomas Kulekowskis and Sandra Kulekowskis v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company
issues for our review: (1) that the trial court failed to follow the appropriate procedure in making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10463 - 2017-09-20
issues for our review: (1) that the trial court failed to follow the appropriate procedure in making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10463 - 2017-09-20
Gregory A. Gensler v. Doris J. Vander Kooi
possession. The following testimony was presented at trial. ¶3 Vander Kooi and Gensler both own land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7115 - 2005-03-31
possession. The following testimony was presented at trial. ¶3 Vander Kooi and Gensler both own land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7115 - 2005-03-31