Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32451 - 32460 of 58540 for us.

[PDF] WI 77
was imposed. As used in this subsection, "actual days spent in custody" includes, without limitation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52056 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 20-03 - Comments from Campaign Legal Center
of the Court. As now-Chief Justice Roggensack put it, “setting up rules puts us, by the fact that we’ve set
/supreme/docs/2003commentscampaignlegalcenter.pdf - 2020-12-01

[PDF] Response Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (Citizen Mathematicians).
used the existing 2011 maps as a template and changed them only as necessary to fully implement all
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefcitizenmath2.pdf - 2022-01-03

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2014
in the formula used for service previously rendered and credited.  Whether the decisions of this court
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122327 - 2014-09-22

[PDF] WI 24
decision if it “examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and using a demonstrative
/supreme/docs/22ap1759.pdf - 2025-06-24

Sheboygan County DSS v. Matthew S.
of appeals interpreted Mikrut as controlling the case before us. Relying on Mikrut, the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18672 - 2005-06-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
1 Pursuant to the policy underlying WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86(4) (2019-20), we use a pseudonym when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593463 - 2022-11-22

Bartlett Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Board
be based: a. Whether the development expected in the tax incremental district would occur without the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3528 - 2005-03-31

State v. John Norman
. He also received monetary bonuses and perks, including the use of snowmobiles and boats. In 1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16574 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. Scott McCallum
at the outset that the merits of Dairyland’s suit for an injunction are not before us in this appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5224 - 2017-09-19