Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32461 - 32470 of 97638 for court records search online.

David L. Grace v. Kay S. Grace
discretion in a particular matter, we look first to the court's on-the-record explanation of the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8168 - 2005-03-31

State v. James H.
by the trial court was unfortunately misspoken. Nevertheless, after reviewing the complete record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lester H. Cook
as follows: [The court has] look[ed] at the record as a whole, not just the sentencing hearing, and of course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10222 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Lester H. Cook
the record of the plea hearing, the trial court denied Cook's request for an evidentiary hearing, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10222 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the videotaped interview, the court found the recording was “an accurate portrayal” free from excision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214493 - 2018-06-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
supported her calculation of the amount owing. The circuit court then went off the record so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245021 - 2019-08-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on the day of the homicide. The circuit court stated on the record that the timeline was inadmissible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=433754 - 2021-09-30

[PDF] State v. Orzell P. Grinnage
)(a) and (b), STATS. The trial court considered Grinnage’s prior record, the seriousness of the offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14260 - 2014-09-15

State v. Orzell P. Grinnage
)(a) and (b), Stats. The trial court considered Grinnage’s prior record, the seriousness of the offenses, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14260 - 2005-03-31

State v. Charlene Cortes
, or if the record irrefutably demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the trial court may, in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3221 - 2005-03-31