Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32471 - 32480 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 32471 - 32480 of 63951 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
effort to ask the court to place the instruction on the record. In any event, since the jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51500 - 2010-06-30
effort to ask the court to place the instruction on the record. In any event, since the jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51500 - 2010-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1967). Immel filed multiple responses. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Immel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794946 - 2024-05-01
(1967). Immel filed multiple responses. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Immel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794946 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
physical placement. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843684 - 2024-08-29
physical placement. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843684 - 2024-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2017- 18)1 motion for postconviction relief. Upon reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245615 - 2019-08-28
(2017- 18)1 motion for postconviction relief. Upon reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245615 - 2019-08-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 767.451(1)(a)1. (2023-24).1 Based upon our review of Jennifer’s brief and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
. § 767.451(1)(a)1. (2023-24).1 Based upon our review of Jennifer’s brief and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals a harassment injunction against him. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347313 - 2021-03-18
appeals a harassment injunction against him. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347313 - 2021-03-18
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
right to testify finds no support in the record and provides no basis for relief. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
right to testify finds no support in the record and provides no basis for relief. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the filing of the no- merit report. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113093 - 2017-09-21
to the filing of the no- merit report. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113093 - 2017-09-21