Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32471 - 32480 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 32471 - 32480 of 58509 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Ryan D. Thompson
first-degree intentional homicide, and aggravated battery. The issue is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5686 - 2017-09-19
first-degree intentional homicide, and aggravated battery. The issue is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5686 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
affirm the order of the circuit court. In 2013, Dietzman was convicted following a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184035 - 2017-09-21
affirm the order of the circuit court. In 2013, Dietzman was convicted following a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184035 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
did not receive a trial on the refusal matter and he did not waive his right to a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70217 - 2011-08-29
did not receive a trial on the refusal matter and he did not waive his right to a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70217 - 2011-08-29
State v. James Martindale
and should be modified. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and a strong policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
and should be modified. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and a strong policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, following a jury trial. ¶3 At trial, officer Ryan Atkinson testified that he observed Ford fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32797 - 2008-05-27
, following a jury trial. ¶3 At trial, officer Ryan Atkinson testified that he observed Ford fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32797 - 2008-05-27
State v. William J. Wocelka
, third offense. He contends that under the penalty scheme of § 346.65(2), Stats., before the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10236 - 2005-03-31
, third offense. He contends that under the penalty scheme of § 346.65(2), Stats., before the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10236 - 2005-03-31
Michael Solomon v. Gary R. McCaughtry
and Roggensack, JJ. PER CURIAM. Michael Solomon, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12940 - 2005-03-31
and Roggensack, JJ. PER CURIAM. Michael Solomon, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12940 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul W. Schnelz
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because no probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11214 - 2011-01-24
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because no probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11214 - 2011-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2012AP2623 2 counsel was ineffective for failing to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103739 - 2017-09-21
No. 2012AP2623 2 counsel was ineffective for failing to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103739 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
portions of the record from the first trial. The court awarded Sarah $5,460. ¶3 The amount of punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47552 - 2014-09-15
portions of the record from the first trial. The court awarded Sarah $5,460. ¶3 The amount of punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47552 - 2014-09-15