Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32481 - 32490 of 97746 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32481 - 32490 of 97746 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 17, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29700 - 2007-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 17, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29700 - 2007-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 8, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123038 - 2014-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 8, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123038 - 2014-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 10, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105211 - 2013-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 10, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105211 - 2013-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
(1980). ¶8 In this case, the circuit court found that Konkol “yielded to the officer’s show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30099 - 2007-08-27
(1980). ¶8 In this case, the circuit court found that Konkol “yielded to the officer’s show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30099 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 3, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63408 - 2011-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 3, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63408 - 2011-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 29, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31010 - 2007-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 29, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31010 - 2007-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court referenced the Bakers’ letter, which inquired whether it “[was] still the case” that they could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73091 - 2011-10-31
, the court referenced the Bakers’ letter, which inquired whether it “[was] still the case” that they could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73091 - 2011-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
between the Oneida guardianship cases and the Portage family court case. The court found that the March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109916 - 2014-04-08
between the Oneida guardianship cases and the Portage family court case. The court found that the March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109916 - 2014-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
not understand that the court was not bound.” Id., ¶73. ¶6 In this case, the record shows that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32221 - 2008-03-31
not understand that the court was not bound.” Id., ¶73. ¶6 In this case, the record shows that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32221 - 2008-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 473-74. ¶11 In this case, the circuit court did not address the four criteria because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29176 - 2007-06-26
. at 473-74. ¶11 In this case, the circuit court did not address the four criteria because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29176 - 2007-06-26