Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32481 - 32490 of 63980 for records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
(1967). Immel filed multiple responses. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Immel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794946 - 2024-05-01

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
right to testify finds no support in the record and provides no basis for relief. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the filing of the no- merit report. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113093 - 2017-09-21

State v. David G. Grimm
arrest. The record reflects that deputy Chad Peterson of the Eau Claire County Sheriffs Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9124 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
a rational, reasoned decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28732 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to accept Michael’s version of facts. The record reflects the court’s consideration of appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112237 - 2017-09-21

State v. Karen Elaine Gilligan
there is sufficient credible evidence in the record to support the trial court's findings, the conviction is affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12726 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
on the basis that there was nothing in the record suggesting Hicks was incompetent, and Hicks did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27238 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the order may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215003 - 2018-07-03