Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32491 - 32500 of 55935 for n y c.

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Amicus Brief of Matthew Petering, PhD.
. ..................... 9 C. Proportionality is the key issue in redistricting, and the Court should use state
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1108amicusmp.pdf - 2023-11-13

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2010
a.m. 09AP828 Ryan C. Tews v. NHI, LLC 10:45 a.m. 08AP2045 Evelyn Werner v. Kenneth Hendree 1
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54993 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jason R. Dixon
and 02-1520-CR(C) ¶36 VERGERONT, P.J. (concurring). I agree with the conclusion in Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5328 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jason R. Dixon
and 02-1520-CR(C) ¶36 VERGERONT, P.J. (concurring). I agree with the conclusion in Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5327 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. John D. Williams
. No. 00-0535-CR(C) ¶15 SNYDER, J. (concurring). The dissent begins by acknowledging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2313 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
it. (c) The party who has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27187 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
is under a duty to supplement discovery responses” under Wis. Stat. § 804.01(5)(a) – (c) existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27187 - 2006-11-20

[PDF] Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
on the briefs of George C. Wilbur, LaFarge. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3514 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Date: September 1, 2023
Caption CountyName 2021AP000075 CRNM State v. Dennis F. Blaine Ozaukee 2022AP000519 CRNM State v. Kazon C
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699590 - 2023-08-31

[PDF] September 20, 2024 OPEN SESSION AGENDA
& Brady. (Handout) C. Appeal of the Ethics of the Matrix: Ethical Obligations & Legal Technology
/courts/offices/docs/bbe_osa_sep24.pdf - 2024-09-16