Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3251 - 3260 of 6962 for a u.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that made this case stand out. We agree with the court’s observation: “[U]nfortunately, in some other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98299 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the automobile contains evidence of a crime.” Id. at 210. By contrast, “[u]nder an analysis of probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644960 - 2023-04-18

[PDF] Donald Graebel v. American Dynatec Corp.
(Ct. App. 1994). In other words, "[u]nder the employee-at-will doctrine, an employer may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15133 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph Williams
law and federal case law interpreting it, we noted that “[u]nder 18 U.S.C. § 891, ‘[t]o extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11239 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
day, the circuit court signed an order amending Vancamp’s bail “[u]pon the stipulation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674172 - 2023-07-05

[PDF] NOTICE
the statement “[u]nderstanding all the above, it is my free and voluntary choice to admit to the allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33857 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
id., 209 Wis. 2d at 191, 562 N.W.2d at 402. The court concluded that “[u]nder the plain language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98791 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
been deficient. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668, 687 (1984). If counsel did not give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67971 - 2013-08-04

COURT OF APPEALS
… and at this point I see no reason to grant the motion for mistrial.” ¶11 “[U]nless a newspaper article is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31146 - 2007-12-11

State v. Jacob M.W.
Maturity and the Attorney-Client Relationship, 33 U. Louisville J. of Fam. L. 629, 645-47, 652 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7574 - 2005-03-31