Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3251 - 3260 of 19472 for inmates search.
Search results 3251 - 3260 of 19472 for inmates search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence because no valid search warrant existed at the time of Hughes’s blood draw. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1130020 - 2026-06-11
evidence because no valid search warrant existed at the time of Hughes’s blood draw. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1130020 - 2026-06-11
[PDF]
State v. John M. Kieffer
the physical evidence obtained during a warrantless search and further claims that a statement made while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10193 - 2017-09-20
the physical evidence obtained during a warrantless search and further claims that a statement made while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10193 - 2017-09-20
State v. Gary A. Johnson
(2003-04).[1] On appeal, Johnson argues that the protective search of his vehicle following a routine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20601 - 2006-01-24
(2003-04).[1] On appeal, Johnson argues that the protective search of his vehicle following a routine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20601 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Gary A. Johnson
On appeal, Johnson argues that the protective search of his vehicle following a routine traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20601 - 2017-09-21
On appeal, Johnson argues that the protective search of his vehicle following a routine traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20601 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence because no valid search warrant existed at the time of Hughes’s blood draw. He argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1130020 - 2026-06-11
evidence because no valid search warrant existed at the time of Hughes’s blood draw. He argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1130020 - 2026-06-11
State v. John M. Kieffer
search and further claims that a statement made while in police custody and after he had received Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10193 - 2005-03-31
search and further claims that a statement made while in police custody and after he had received Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10193 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 76
that denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained in the execution of two search warrants. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040263 - 2026-03-23
that denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained in the execution of two search warrants. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040263 - 2026-03-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and search of his person. Because the officer was not able to point to specific and articulable facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72163 - 2014-09-15
and search of his person. Because the officer was not able to point to specific and articulable facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72163 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
detention and search of his person. Because the officer was not able to point to specific and articulable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11
detention and search of his person. Because the officer was not able to point to specific and articulable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11
[PDF]
from his residence. The issue in this appeal is whether the warrant’s authorization to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470042 - 2022-01-10
from his residence. The issue in this appeal is whether the warrant’s authorization to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470042 - 2022-01-10