Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3251 - 3260 of 56178 for n y c.
Search results 3251 - 3260 of 56178 for n y c.
COURT OF APPEALS
of substantial battery.” As to the jury instruction, the entirety of Dillon’s prejudice argument is that “[b]y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143653 - 2015-06-29
of substantial battery.” As to the jury instruction, the entirety of Dillon’s prejudice argument is that “[b]y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143653 - 2015-06-29
County of Fond du Lac v. Melissa M. Wondra Tarrant
-Tarrant was impaired.” The trial judge observed that “[b]y that same logic, we could have the entire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6436 - 2005-03-31
-Tarrant was impaired.” The trial judge observed that “[b]y that same logic, we could have the entire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
X and stated Y, Z. The deputy stated that the recitation was with slurred speech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18733 - 2017-09-21
X and stated Y, Z. The deputy stated that the recitation was with slurred speech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18733 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the victim, and noted that with strangulation “[y]ou are choking off their breath.” The court inferred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110587 - 2014-04-22
of the victim, and noted that with strangulation “[y]ou are choking off their breath.” The court inferred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110587 - 2014-04-22
State v. Henry Bloomfield
that Ashley had fabricated the assault to get attention. The trial court disagreed, stating: [Y]ou may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5636 - 2005-03-31
that Ashley had fabricated the assault to get attention. The trial court disagreed, stating: [Y]ou may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5636 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Henry Bloomfield
disagreed, stating: [Y]ou may be able to argue that butt out, its my case has some relevance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5636 - 2017-09-19
disagreed, stating: [Y]ou may be able to argue that butt out, its my case has some relevance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5636 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s remarks about his history of drug and alcohol abuse. The sentencing court stated: [Y]ou had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36300 - 2009-04-28
court’s remarks about his history of drug and alcohol abuse. The sentencing court stated: [Y]ou had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36300 - 2009-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the face of the warrant stated “you are commanded forthwith to search the said premises” and “[y]ou
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632052 - 2023-03-15
the face of the warrant stated “you are commanded forthwith to search the said premises” and “[y]ou
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632052 - 2023-03-15
[PDF]
Gary P. Ellis v. Sawyer County Board of Appeals
, oppressive or unreasonable. The Ellises only claim that “[b]y proceeding under incorrect theories of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6311 - 2017-09-19
, oppressive or unreasonable. The Ellises only claim that “[b]y proceeding under incorrect theories of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6311 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
[.] [Y]ou deserve it.” Heintz visually recorded the events on his cellphone. The parties’ two young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105043 - 2013-12-03
[.] [Y]ou deserve it.” Heintz visually recorded the events on his cellphone. The parties’ two young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105043 - 2013-12-03