Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3251 - 3260 of 12869 for se.
Search results 3251 - 3260 of 12869 for se.
[PDF]
State v. Nathan Gillis
., and Deininger, J. PER CURIAM. Nathan Gillis, pro se, appeals the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13231 - 2017-09-21
., and Deininger, J. PER CURIAM. Nathan Gillis, pro se, appeals the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13231 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Philip Woof, pro se, appeals an order of the circuit court dismissing his counterclaims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118994 - 2014-08-04
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Philip Woof, pro se, appeals an order of the circuit court dismissing his counterclaims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118994 - 2014-08-04
[PDF]
State v. Jose M. Aldazabal
to ten years' imprisonment. Aldazabal, proceeding pro se, contends that his double jeopardy rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8356 - 2017-09-19
to ten years' imprisonment. Aldazabal, proceeding pro se, contends that his double jeopardy rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8356 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2016AP1220-CRNM 2 se postconviction motion was filed in October 2017. Good cause is shown
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206857 - 2018-01-08
. No. 2016AP1220-CRNM 2 se postconviction motion was filed in October 2017. Good cause is shown
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206857 - 2018-01-08
State v. Jose M. Aldazabal
. Aldazabal, proceeding pro se, contends that his double jeopardy rights were violated because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8356 - 2005-03-31
. Aldazabal, proceeding pro se, contends that his double jeopardy rights were violated because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8356 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. George appeals pro se from orders denying his postconviction motion to amend his judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147221 - 2015-09-01
. George appeals pro se from orders denying his postconviction motion to amend his judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147221 - 2015-09-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Kessler, Brennan and Brash, JJ. Jeffrey S. Freitag, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s placement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176350 - 2017-09-21
Kessler, Brennan and Brash, JJ. Jeffrey S. Freitag, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s placement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176350 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Higginbotham, P.J., Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Robert Tessen, pro se, appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34588 - 2008-11-12
Higginbotham, P.J., Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Robert Tessen, pro se, appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34588 - 2008-11-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Warren Slocum, pro se, appeals an order denying his “appeal on certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954603 - 2025-05-13
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Warren Slocum, pro se, appeals an order denying his “appeal on certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954603 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and Blanchard, JJ. Dennis Hohol, pro se, appeals an order quashing his petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99850 - 2014-09-15
and Blanchard, JJ. Dennis Hohol, pro se, appeals an order quashing his petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99850 - 2014-09-15