Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3251 - 3260 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 3251 - 3260 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2010AP2946 2 ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.1 Wesley M. appeals a trial court order involuntarily terminating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65601 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2010AP2946 2 ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.1 Wesley M. appeals a trial court order involuntarily terminating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65601 - 2014-09-15
David C. v. Milwaukee County Department of Human Services
of the girls' biological aunt, Gwen E. The C's claim that: (1) the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9166 - 2005-03-31
of the girls' biological aunt, Gwen E. The C's claim that: (1) the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9166 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark T. Smith
that: (1) the trial court erred when it refused to order a competency evaluation; (2) his right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6931 - 2005-03-31
that: (1) the trial court erred when it refused to order a competency evaluation; (2) his right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David C. v. Milwaukee County Department of Human Services
) the trial court erred in finding that it was in the children's best interests to change placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9166 - 2017-09-19
) the trial court erred in finding that it was in the children's best interests to change placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9166 - 2017-09-19
State v. William F. Williams
which denied postconviction relief from the judgment.[1] Williams claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31
which denied postconviction relief from the judgment.[1] Williams claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark T. Smith
§§ 943.10(1)(a), 939.62 (2001–02). 1 Smith claims that: (1) the trial court erred when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6931 - 2017-09-20
§§ 943.10(1)(a), 939.62 (2001–02). 1 Smith claims that: (1) the trial court erred when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6931 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, her lawyer’s constitutionally deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100948 - 2013-08-19
to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, her lawyer’s constitutionally deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100948 - 2013-08-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for relief. She argues that she is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100948 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for relief. She argues that she is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100948 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Kollmann
to WIS. STAT. § 940.225(3) No. 03-3490-CR 2 (2001-02) 1 after a jury trial and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7184 - 2017-09-20
to WIS. STAT. § 940.225(3) No. 03-3490-CR 2 (2001-02) 1 after a jury trial and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7184 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as charged, and the State agreed to recommend “prison, leaving the amount up to the [c]ourt.” The trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179817 - 2017-09-21
as charged, and the State agreed to recommend “prison, leaving the amount up to the [c]ourt.” The trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179817 - 2017-09-21