Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32501 - 32510 of 97761 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32501 - 32510 of 97761 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 15, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33393 - 2011-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 15, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33393 - 2011-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 8, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138978 - 2015-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 8, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138978 - 2015-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 29, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111223 - 2014-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 29, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111223 - 2014-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66702 - 2011-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66702 - 2011-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
In this case, the circuit court determined the loan agreements Drogorub signed were procedurally unconscionable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90814 - 2012-12-17
In this case, the circuit court determined the loan agreements Drogorub signed were procedurally unconscionable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90814 - 2012-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
trial court commented that, “when I look at the facts of this case, it’s clear that [Campbell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55744 - 2010-10-20
trial court commented that, “when I look at the facts of this case, it’s clear that [Campbell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55744 - 2010-10-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a CHIPS court order. Sec. 48.415(5). In Renee’s case, the subsection (5) ground was based on her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93091 - 2014-09-15
to a CHIPS court order. Sec. 48.415(5). In Renee’s case, the subsection (5) ground was based on her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93091 - 2014-09-15
City of Milwaukee Fire and Police Commission v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-1347 & 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10881 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-1347 & 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10881 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts of this case from those in the cases relied on by the trial court, Joerres and Nehls v. Meyer, 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35130 - 2009-01-13
the facts of this case from those in the cases relied on by the trial court, Joerres and Nehls v. Meyer, 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35130 - 2009-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
determination. Id., ¶¶5-6, 9 (footnotes omitted). ¶39 In this case, the trial court offered ample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39232 - 2009-08-10
determination. Id., ¶¶5-6, 9 (footnotes omitted). ¶39 In this case, the trial court offered ample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39232 - 2009-08-10