Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32501 - 32510 of 44739 for part.

State v. Douglas D. Schoepp
privilege." [5] Section 343.305(9)(a), Stats., provides in relevant part: The notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9524 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
experience, were working in the area as part of the Neighborhood Task Force, which Tischer described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183242 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael G. Kachelski
. at 685. Strickland set forth a two-part test for determining whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31

Patrick J. Connors v. Don Slama
that Connors had not met his burden of proof under Wis. Stat. § 452.20, which states in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2238 - 2005-03-31

State v. Yathzee D. Inman
without a hearing. Inman premised his motion, in part, on his claim that his first counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
(1969), was overruled in part on other grounds by Alabama v. Smith, 490 U.S. 794 (1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32112 - 2014-09-15

State v. Timothy L. Runke
the multiplicity issue as a part of the plea agreement, see State v. Hubbard, 206 Wis. 2d 651, 655-57, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21358 - 2006-02-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to completed armed robbery “was not part of the appellate record” in his no-merit appeal, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698435 - 2023-09-06

[PDF] State v. Michael Daniels
attempted two murders so “a third one wouldn't be shit” was admissible because it was a part of the threat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9988 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
that it was “an oversight” on his part. The circuit court denied the postconviction motion, ruling that Hall failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103641 - 2013-10-27