Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32501 - 32510 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 32501 - 32510 of 63981 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Nelson
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10289 - 2017-09-20
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10289 - 2017-09-20
State v. Larry E. Kraemer
reviewed the record and agrees with the State that there is no dispute that Kraemer met all the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13356 - 2005-03-31
reviewed the record and agrees with the State that there is no dispute that Kraemer met all the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13356 - 2005-03-31
Judith N. Nolan v. John R. Knight
, and a stamp recording the 8:10 a.m., October 15 service date and time. A separate original stamp confirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16292 - 2005-03-31
, and a stamp recording the 8:10 a.m., October 15 service date and time. A separate original stamp confirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16292 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does not support his position. Batson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33531 - 2008-07-29
that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does not support his position. Batson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33531 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
Ellen M. Wockenfus v. Randy L. Wockenfus
. However, whether or not the court found Randy’s vocational choice unreasonable, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6821 - 2017-09-20
. However, whether or not the court found Randy’s vocational choice unreasonable, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6821 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. (WI App Aug. 26, 2020) (Schwerdtfeger I). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446012 - 2021-10-27
. (WI App Aug. 26, 2020) (Schwerdtfeger I). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446012 - 2021-10-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, counsel’s response to this court’s order, and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558168 - 2022-08-25
, counsel’s response to this court’s order, and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558168 - 2022-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s history of undesirable behavior pattern, 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78867 - 2012-03-06
. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s history of undesirable behavior pattern, 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78867 - 2012-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
if the record shows it to be clearly erroneous, after accepting all credibility determinations made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143654 - 2017-09-21
if the record shows it to be clearly erroneous, after accepting all credibility determinations made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143654 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812059 - 2024-06-11
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812059 - 2024-06-11