Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32511 - 32520 of 57358 for id.

State v. Victoria L. Stark
the burden to show there was an erroneous exercise of discretion, id. 201 Wis.2d at 43, 547 N.W.2d at 809
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13784 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. See id. The relevant facts are undisputed here and therefore only the legal determination of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40058 - 2009-08-26

Reverend William T. Howie v. Robert L. Weisensel
An insurer has a duty to exercise good faith in the settlement of a claim. Id. at 60. However, that duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6308 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] County of Green Lake v. John D. Pearson
be made even though the statute did not recite such a requirement. See id.2 The court so construed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15292 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Walter L. Merten v. Department of Transportation
. Id. at 608. The trial court’s decision on a § 806.07 motion is discretionary. Id. at 607. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2723 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and convincing evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344600 - 2021-03-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to establish a chain of custody with regard to blood samples in a paternity action. See id. We explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220603 - 2018-10-09

County of Langlade v. Stanley S. Drabek
with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant’" the investigatory stop. Id. (quoting Terry v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11627 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jerold L. Rober
Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. Although the circuit court is presumed to have acted reasonably, id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21028 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ronald M. Vales
). The second prong requires a showing that the deficient performance was prejudicial. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10065 - 2005-03-31