Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 40068 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 40068 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Smothers
. Smothers refused to give the officers consent to search the apartment and had not given any statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12965 - 2017-09-21
. Smothers refused to give the officers consent to search the apartment and had not given any statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12965 - 2017-09-21
St. Croix County v. Adam Douglas Cress
“statement that he reasonably didn’t believe [Cress] was intentionally damaging the property I can’t find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3353 - 2005-03-31
“statement that he reasonably didn’t believe [Cress] was intentionally damaging the property I can’t find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3353 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
return to the United States. Finally, the Commission heard statements at the parole hearing from four
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929301 - 2025-03-19
return to the United States. Finally, the Commission heard statements at the parole hearing from four
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929301 - 2025-03-19
Thomas A. Higbee v. Gary L. Higbee, Sr.
the acts and statements of the person, in view of the surrounding circumstances. See W.W.W., 185 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13745 - 2005-03-31
the acts and statements of the person, in view of the surrounding circumstances. See W.W.W., 185 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13745 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
petition, Krueger first argued he is entitled to coram nobis relief because “[t]here is no statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832723 - 2024-07-31
petition, Krueger first argued he is entitled to coram nobis relief because “[t]here is no statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832723 - 2024-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“Dicta is a statement … in a court’s opinion which extends beyond the facts in the case and is broader
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32138 - 2008-03-17
) (“Dicta is a statement … in a court’s opinion which extends beyond the facts in the case and is broader
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32138 - 2008-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
our attention to the statements and testimony of various Village employees, officials and attorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29202 - 2007-05-29
our attention to the statements and testimony of various Village employees, officials and attorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29202 - 2007-05-29
State v. Kionta L. Crockett
highly similar.” On appeal, Crockett contends that the trial court’s postconviction statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20603 - 2005-12-12
highly similar.” On appeal, Crockett contends that the trial court’s postconviction statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20603 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is the videotape itself, such as when the circuit court only has a child’s statement on videotape, appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194107 - 2017-09-21
is the videotape itself, such as when the circuit court only has a child’s statement on videotape, appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194107 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statement at the time of sentencing are not only part and parcel of the nature of the crime itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69297 - 2014-09-15
statement at the time of sentencing are not only part and parcel of the nature of the crime itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69297 - 2014-09-15