Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 57395 for id.

State v. Larry N. Henkel
matters. Id. at 64-65, 471 N.W.2d at 60. Because the trial court took into account the new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12465 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Edward G. Stolzman v. Mary A. Stolzman
of the parties.” Id. The fairness objective is meant to “ensure a fair and equitable financial arrangement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13884 - 2014-09-15

City of Whitewater v. Darren R. Gill
and the transcript shall be transferred to the circuit court for review. [Emphasis added.] Id.; see City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14234 - 2005-03-31

Badger Home Builders, Inc. v. Paul J. Kaminski
). Similarly, whether a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law. See id. Either type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15770 - 2005-03-31

Amy Weisman v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies
. It also notes that Black's defines "inter" as "between." Id. at 811. Thus, following this route
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7710 - 2005-03-31

Steven W. Gradeless v. Beverly Gradeless
doctrine may be applied to third parties as well as to the married couple. Id. at 700-01. “[I]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6712 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the circuit court considered and weighed the appropriate sentencing factors. Id. (numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77422 - 2012-01-31

COURT OF APPEALS
judge could reach.” Id., ¶7. ¶6 Moes argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28869 - 2007-04-30

State v. Melvin D. Parker, Jr.
underlying findings of historical fact are sustained unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4522 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ronald M. Vales
that the deficient performance was prejudicial. See id. If the defendant is unable to show one prong, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10065 - 2017-09-19