Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 44749 for part.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 44749 for part.
State v. Ronald L. Dantuma
the Second Court of an important part of its inherent power to consider a proffer of evidence in any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15492 - 2005-03-31
the Second Court of an important part of its inherent power to consider a proffer of evidence in any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15492 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
also explicitly confirmed Staples’s understanding that the judge was not part of the plea agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127099 - 2014-11-05
also explicitly confirmed Staples’s understanding that the judge was not part of the plea agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127099 - 2014-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm. Knauf purchased a home from the Knudsens in 2015. As part
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921439 - 2025-03-05
. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm. Knauf purchased a home from the Knudsens in 2015. As part
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921439 - 2025-03-05
State v. Anthony Hicks
was arrested and charged with attempted delivery of cocaine as part of an undercover sting operation set up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9369 - 2005-03-31
was arrested and charged with attempted delivery of cocaine as part of an undercover sting operation set up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9369 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
were part and parcel of Duncan’s failure to timely retain or consult with new counsel and timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122857 - 2014-09-30
were part and parcel of Duncan’s failure to timely retain or consult with new counsel and timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122857 - 2014-09-30
State v. Carl Andre Brown
function of weighing and sifting conflicting testimony in part because of the jury’s ability to give weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
function of weighing and sifting conflicting testimony in part because of the jury’s ability to give weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
Donna Walag v. Town of Randall
. Section 66.014(2)(e), Stats., provides in part: “No person who has signed a petition shall be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11576 - 2005-03-31
. Section 66.014(2)(e), Stats., provides in part: “No person who has signed a petition shall be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11576 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tony Blackwell
of the record, the evidence, and any testimony other than part of the defendant's testimony which is exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11878 - 2005-03-31
of the record, the evidence, and any testimony other than part of the defendant's testimony which is exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11878 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the prosecution refused to disclose as part of discovery. He also claims entitlement to resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
that the prosecution refused to disclose as part of discovery. He also claims entitlement to resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
Certification
JI-Criminal 2146A. The statute states, in relevant part, “(1m) Whoever possesses any undeveloped
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36967 - 2009-06-30
JI-Criminal 2146A. The statute states, in relevant part, “(1m) Whoever possesses any undeveloped
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36967 - 2009-06-30