Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 56188 for so.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 56188 for so.
[PDF]
Jennifer Switzer v. Jonathan C. Switzer
N.W.2d 606. “[T]he purpose of statutory interpretation is to determine what the statute means so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20739 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 606. “[T]he purpose of statutory interpretation is to determine what the statute means so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20739 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 91
that avoids absurd results. Id., ¶46. We also consider the purpose of the statute so far as its purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32758 - 2014-09-15
that avoids absurd results. Id., ¶46. We also consider the purpose of the statute so far as its purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32758 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but before it was tested, so long as she clearly and unequivocally withdrew her consent; Randall did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214267 - 2018-06-14
but before it was tested, so long as she clearly and unequivocally withdrew her consent; Randall did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214267 - 2018-06-14
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
, Ameritech elected to be subject to price regulation under § 196.196. In doing so, Ameritech submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6785 - 2005-03-31
, Ameritech elected to be subject to price regulation under § 196.196. In doing so, Ameritech submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6785 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 36
more to avoid giving the court late notice. Without expressly saying so, the circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28134 - 2007-03-27
more to avoid giving the court late notice. Without expressly saying so, the circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28134 - 2007-03-27
Brent J. Stubbe v. Guidant Mutual Insurance Company
possible so that … none of the language [is] discarded as superfluous or meaningless.”). Additionally, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4391 - 2005-03-31
possible so that … none of the language [is] discarded as superfluous or meaningless.”). Additionally, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Delco Electronics Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, 172 Wis.2d 234, 244-45, 493 N.W.2d 68, 73 (1992), or when an agency’s position has been so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14151 - 2014-09-15
, 172 Wis.2d 234, 244-45, 493 N.W.2d 68, 73 (1992), or when an agency’s position has been so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14151 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David A. Foy
(If "Special" JUDGE: Edwin C. Dahlberg so indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20
(If "Special" JUDGE: Edwin C. Dahlberg so indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ordered the following at the conclusion of trial: So in the interest of [child] I am ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214504 - 2018-06-21
ordered the following at the conclusion of trial: So in the interest of [child] I am ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214504 - 2018-06-21
Appeal No
or underinsured motor vehicle; and 2. If so, in what amount? If there is no agreement, these questions shall
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58795 - 2011-01-10
or underinsured motor vehicle; and 2. If so, in what amount? If there is no agreement, these questions shall
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58795 - 2011-01-10