Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 58508 for speedy trial.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 58508 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Thomas argues his trial attorney was ineffective by failing to move to suppress DNA evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133555 - 2017-09-21
. Thomas argues his trial attorney was ineffective by failing to move to suppress DNA evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133555 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bruce M. Stevens
that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained after a “no-knock” entry of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12216 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained after a “no-knock” entry of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12216 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
negligence claim on the basis of recreational immunity, but the trial court denied the motions. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145306 - 2015-07-27
negligence claim on the basis of recreational immunity, but the trial court denied the motions. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145306 - 2015-07-27
The Wisconsin Conference Board of Trustees of the United Methodist Church, Inc. v. Ronald Culver
under § 187.15(4). The Trial Court Proceedings ¶11 Elo moved for dismissal of the UMC’s complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15625 - 2005-03-31
under § 187.15(4). The Trial Court Proceedings ¶11 Elo moved for dismissal of the UMC’s complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ethel M. Payne v. Acuity
Company f/n/a Heritage Insurance Company. The trial court concluded that injuries Ethel M. Payne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18335 - 2017-09-21
Company f/n/a Heritage Insurance Company. The trial court concluded that injuries Ethel M. Payne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18335 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
than it agreed to recommend. Echols also contends his trial No. 2011AP375-CR 2 attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73090 - 2014-09-15
than it agreed to recommend. Echols also contends his trial No. 2011AP375-CR 2 attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73090 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was denied his right to self-representation at trial; (5) counsel was not authorized to stipulate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81181 - 2012-04-18
was denied his right to self-representation at trial; (5) counsel was not authorized to stipulate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81181 - 2012-04-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
Cooper claims the trial court erred in denying his motion seeking to suppress evidence obtained during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28894 - 2014-09-15
Cooper claims the trial court erred in denying his motion seeking to suppress evidence obtained during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28894 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
establishes the law of the case, which must be followed in all subsequent proceedings in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44371 - 2014-09-15
establishes the law of the case, which must be followed in all subsequent proceedings in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44371 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jack R. Hayes
with Zieve each time. ¶15 Two witnesses corroborated Hayes’s trial testimony. One bartender testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4784 - 2005-03-31
with Zieve each time. ¶15 Two witnesses corroborated Hayes’s trial testimony. One bartender testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4784 - 2005-03-31