Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32531 - 32540 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 32531 - 32540 of 62360 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
; they were not warranted by existing law; and, they lacked evidentiary support.” ¶13 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
; they were not warranted by existing law; and, they lacked evidentiary support.” ¶13 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying his suppression motion because the undisputed facts do not support probable cause to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54519 - 2010-09-15
in denying his suppression motion because the undisputed facts do not support probable cause to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54519 - 2010-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings support the conclusion that a reasonable suspicion was established presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29589 - 2007-07-04
factual findings support the conclusion that a reasonable suspicion was established presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29589 - 2007-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
-discovered evidence supporting his theory that Smith committed the robbery. ¶6 The circuit court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64048 - 2011-05-16
-discovered evidence supporting his theory that Smith committed the robbery. ¶6 The circuit court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64048 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
Northwestern National Insurance Company of Milwaukee v. Arthur S. Yorkes
evidence in support of its collection claim, it was incumbent on Yorkes to submit evidentiary material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14833 - 2017-09-21
evidence in support of its collection claim, it was incumbent on Yorkes to submit evidentiary material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14833 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supports a claim of self-defense. “A person is privileged to … intentionally use force against another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953294 - 2025-05-08
supports a claim of self-defense. “A person is privileged to … intentionally use force against another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953294 - 2025-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
the evidence at the hearing overwhelmingly supports the board’s decision. ¶10 Schwister insists the Towns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28212 - 2007-02-26
the evidence at the hearing overwhelmingly supports the board’s decision. ¶10 Schwister insists the Towns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28212 - 2007-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
instruction is appropriate only if a reasonable view of the evidence supports a conviction on the lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894664 - 2024-12-26
instruction is appropriate only if a reasonable view of the evidence supports a conviction on the lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894664 - 2024-12-26
Edward A. Moore v. Shane Dalbec
and erroneously dismissed his claim against American Family as a consequence. Because the record fails to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14304 - 2005-03-31
and erroneously dismissed his claim against American Family as a consequence. Because the record fails to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. J.B. Franklin, Jr.
insufficient to support a conclusion that he “was incompetent or lacked the substantial capacity for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10145 - 2017-09-19
insufficient to support a conclusion that he “was incompetent or lacked the substantial capacity for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10145 - 2017-09-19