Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32531 - 32540 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 32531 - 32540 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Northcentral Technical College v. Central Wisconsin Uniserv Council-North
with institutional accreditation and educational policy, matters that it claims are outside the legitimate confines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15948 - 2005-03-31
with institutional accreditation and educational policy, matters that it claims are outside the legitimate confines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15948 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
insofar as it relates to an issue he raised in his response. Washington claims in his response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=412657 - 2021-08-24
insofar as it relates to an issue he raised in his response. Washington claims in his response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=412657 - 2021-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP1049-CR 3 victim did not allege occurred). White further claimed that trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379291 - 2021-06-23
. No. 2020AP1049-CR 3 victim did not allege occurred). White further claimed that trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379291 - 2021-06-23
[PDF]
State v. Jess K. Quinn
is entitled to a new trial because his claim of inaccuracies or omissions in the trial transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25583 - 2017-09-21
is entitled to a new trial because his claim of inaccuracies or omissions in the trial transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25583 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
made a prima facie case for summary judgment on its claims. Hessil could not “rest on mere denials
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97973 - 2013-06-11
made a prima facie case for summary judgment on its claims. Hessil could not “rest on mere denials
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97973 - 2013-06-11
State v. Daniel Mahnke
and that the sentence was unduly harsh. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8557 - 2005-03-31
and that the sentence was unduly harsh. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8557 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.04(11). Instead, he emphasizes that he is not asserting an affirmative constitutional claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601184 - 2022-12-21
. § 806.04(11). Instead, he emphasizes that he is not asserting an affirmative constitutional claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601184 - 2022-12-21
State v. Joseph M. Rucker
and related expert testimony. In this appeal, we only address Rucker's second and third claims. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10993 - 2005-03-31
and related expert testimony. In this appeal, we only address Rucker's second and third claims. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10993 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not interview or subpoena Hernandez, who would have refuted Mary’s claim that she was threatened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31404 - 2008-01-07
not interview or subpoena Hernandez, who would have refuted Mary’s claim that she was threatened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31404 - 2008-01-07
State v. Kurt G. Culver
any intent to sell the drug. He instead claimed that the marijuana was for his own personal use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4130 - 2005-03-31
any intent to sell the drug. He instead claimed that the marijuana was for his own personal use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4130 - 2005-03-31