Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32531 - 32540 of 63530 for records/1000.
Search results 32531 - 32540 of 63530 for records/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
the presumptive minimum sentence, it shall place its reasons for so doing on the record. Id. No circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59173 - 2014-09-15
the presumptive minimum sentence, it shall place its reasons for so doing on the record. Id. No circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59173 - 2014-09-15
Turi Jo Miller v. Terrance J. Halvorson
to evidence in the record. We agree and reverse the order. We remand for further proceedings consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21226 - 2006-02-06
to evidence in the record. We agree and reverse the order. We remand for further proceedings consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21226 - 2006-02-06
[PDF]
Diane T. Gilbert v. David G. Gilbert
the September 3rd hearing. The record indicates that David signed the deed on the day of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15342 - 2017-09-21
the September 3rd hearing. The record indicates that David signed the deed on the day of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15342 - 2017-09-21
State v. Landris T. Jines
, or if the record conclusively resolves the issue against the defendant. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18671 - 2005-06-22
, or if the record conclusively resolves the issue against the defendant. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18671 - 2005-06-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 971.11 (2019- 20).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=519156 - 2022-05-11
. STAT. § 971.11 (2019- 20).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=519156 - 2022-05-11
State v. John D. Mascaretti
had stipulated to the prior convictions. The record supports this assertion. Furthermore, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15614 - 2005-03-31
had stipulated to the prior convictions. The record supports this assertion. Furthermore, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15614 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
[PDF]
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
of the defendant's prior record was on file with the Court in the [check charge] case where the defendant filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11445 - 2017-09-19
of the defendant's prior record was on file with the Court in the [check charge] case where the defendant filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11445 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214198 - 2018-06-20
no response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214198 - 2018-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218888 - 2018-09-12
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218888 - 2018-09-12

