Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32551 - 32560 of 39862 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Governor's Response to Motion for Reconsideration
(quoting Decision ¶ 31). Respondents say that the Court’s statement is inaccurate—that they did
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0104governorresponse.pdf - 2024-01-05

[PDF] Alma Bicknese, M.D. v. Thomas B. Sutula
, which at first blush is a rather innocuous statement indicating that "public officer immunity does
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16404 - 2017-09-21

Gene L. Olstad v. Microsoft Corporation
). ¶67 These statements contradict Microsoft's interpretation of the 1980 action and document
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18993 - 2005-07-12

[PDF] WI 73
with this statement, believing that this approach does not ensure a fair appraisal process. Dissent, ¶¶73-74
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37468 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 78
asterisk which leads to the statement, two lines below: "Limits might be reduced by policy provision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52070 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Antoinette Robinson v. Town of Bristol
, by proceeding under WIS. STAT. § 66.60 (1959-60) regarding a street improvement without filing a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5293 - 2017-09-19

Alma Bicknese, M.D. v. Thomas B. Sutula
forth in footnote 2, which at first blush is a rather innocuous statement indicating that "public
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16404 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
by a double asterisk which leads to the statement, two lines below: "Limits might be reduced by policy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52070 - 2010-07-13

Antoinette Robinson v. Town of Bristol
improvement without filing a statement required by that section for the exercise of its police powers, could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5293 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 17
]hether a defendant’s undisputed statements and actions in a criminal proceeding constitute waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184936 - 2017-09-21