Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32561 - 32570 of 57351 for id.
Search results 32561 - 32570 of 57351 for id.
State v. Gary Bryant
court and we will only reverse if the trial court has failed to properly exercise its discretion.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11928 - 2005-03-31
court and we will only reverse if the trial court has failed to properly exercise its discretion.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11928 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: That custody credits should be applied in a mathematically linear fashion. Id. at 100. The court also endorsed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119848 - 2014-08-25
: That custody credits should be applied in a mathematically linear fashion. Id. at 100. The court also endorsed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119848 - 2014-08-25
[PDF]
Jerome Foods, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
reasonable cause not to rehire the claimant. Id. at 123. Jerome Foods argues that Strzyzewski failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2904 - 2017-09-19
reasonable cause not to rehire the claimant. Id. at 123. Jerome Foods argues that Strzyzewski failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2904 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
must also be considered. Id. “[T]he focus should be on what is fair to both parties, not just one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88589 - 2014-09-15
must also be considered. Id. “[T]he focus should be on what is fair to both parties, not just one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88589 - 2014-09-15
Bill Youa Sue Vang v. Mai Y. Vang
We review the court’s factual findings using the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶8. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26078 - 2006-08-02
We review the court’s factual findings using the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶8. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26078 - 2006-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing is a question of law that we review independently. Id. If a defendant’s motion does not allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34474 - 2008-11-03
a hearing is a question of law that we review independently. Id. If a defendant’s motion does not allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34474 - 2008-11-03
CA Blank Order
or Kiekhefer’s room. Id. at 465-66, 475. We now turn to whether the tenant’s consent to the officer’s search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95174 - 2013-04-04
or Kiekhefer’s room. Id. at 465-66, 475. We now turn to whether the tenant’s consent to the officer’s search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95174 - 2013-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
that a reasonable judge could reach.” Id. (citation omitted). ¶7 Dismissal of an action is warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99971 - 2013-07-30
that a reasonable judge could reach.” Id. (citation omitted). ¶7 Dismissal of an action is warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99971 - 2013-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice the defendant must demonstrate that those acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35062 - 2008-12-29
competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice the defendant must demonstrate that those acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35062 - 2008-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id., ¶36. Whether a particular set of facts constitutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207234 - 2018-01-17
factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id., ¶36. Whether a particular set of facts constitutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207234 - 2018-01-17