Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32571 - 32580 of 59320 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Lealon R. Knecht
in Knecht’s postconviction motion. Knecht sought an evidentiary hearing on his claim that he was incompetent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10338 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
as a claim for plea withdrawal under Bangert. Even assuming that it was—the position most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955287 - 2025-05-13

State v. Irving T. Washington
This appeal comes to us in the context of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because Washington did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26131 - 2006-08-07

[PDF] Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
., are children in need of protection and services (CHIPS) under WIS. STAT. § 48.13. He claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15192 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Mayfield Pennington
cross-examination, as well as statements the prosecutor made during closing argument, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16273 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Irving T. Washington
in the context of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because Washington did not pursue a direct appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26131 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and claimed he was too drunk to have driven the five miles from the bar to the location where his truck got
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206853 - 2018-01-17

COURT OF APPEALS
further noted “that a defendant claiming a Fourth Amendment violation may support his or her claim using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143920 - 2015-07-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
whether Young could pursue an arguably meritorious claim that she was denied her right to a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257471 - 2020-04-14

Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
. Spickler argues that the record supports its estoppel claim. We disagree and affirm the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31