Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32571 - 32580 of 64014 for records/1000.
Search results 32571 - 32580 of 64014 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the briefs and the record, we conclude that summary disposition is appropriate. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121231 - 2014-09-15
the briefs and the record, we conclude that summary disposition is appropriate. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121231 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James F. Emerich
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17(1) (2011-12).[1] Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123026 - 2014-10-07
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17(1) (2011-12).[1] Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123026 - 2014-10-07
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Thomas E. Zablocki
to keep complete records of trust account funds. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Zablocki
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21087 - 2006-01-26
to keep complete records of trust account funds. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Zablocki
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21087 - 2006-01-26
State v. Glenn Eric Rhodes
: “It is a fact of record that the only thing that the defendant-appellant [Rhodes] was in possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14158 - 2005-03-31
: “It is a fact of record that the only thing that the defendant-appellant [Rhodes] was in possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214198 - 2018-06-20
no response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214198 - 2018-06-20
CA Blank Order
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged three grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2015-03-23
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged three grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2015-03-23
James Burkmaster v. Robert Wayne Heimerl
its discretion if it articulates its reasoning, relies on facts of record and the correct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12158 - 2005-03-31
its discretion if it articulates its reasoning, relies on facts of record and the correct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of his right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922326 - 2025-03-05
of his right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922326 - 2025-03-05