Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32581 - 32590 of 57351 for id.
Search results 32581 - 32590 of 57351 for id.
State v. Jeffrey H. Andrus
to the trial court that a defendant's actions warrant a more severe sentence than that recommended. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9189 - 2005-03-31
to the trial court that a defendant's actions warrant a more severe sentence than that recommended. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9189 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dontae L. Doyle
(1996)]. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21020 - 2006-01-23
(1996)]. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21020 - 2006-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome. Id. A reviewing court’s confidence in the outcome may be less easily undermined where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41446 - 2009-09-28
in the outcome. Id. A reviewing court’s confidence in the outcome may be less easily undermined where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41446 - 2009-09-28
State v. Carlton R. Holland
.” Id. If there is a possibility that the jury “could have drawn the appropriate inferences from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3829 - 2005-03-31
.” Id. If there is a possibility that the jury “could have drawn the appropriate inferences from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3829 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian S.
of the criteria under § 48.18(5). Id. When reviewing a juvenile court's exercise of discretion, we first look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10233 - 2017-09-20
of the criteria under § 48.18(5). Id. When reviewing a juvenile court's exercise of discretion, we first look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10233 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the protection afforded by the statute.” Id. A party asserting the health care services review privilege bears
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=404205 - 2021-08-11
of the protection afforded by the statute.” Id. A party asserting the health care services review privilege bears
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=404205 - 2021-08-11
[PDF]
Robert Bartels v. William Brey
(1954). Literally translated quantum meruit means “as much as he deserved.” Id. at 529. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2163 - 2017-09-19
(1954). Literally translated quantum meruit means “as much as he deserved.” Id. at 529. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2163 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to judgment as a matter of law. Id. at 496-97. ¶7 Bednarek argues that summary judgment was inappropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56716 - 2014-09-15
to judgment as a matter of law. Id. at 496-97. ¶7 Bednarek argues that summary judgment was inappropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56716 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Gary Rowland v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
to support them. Id. at 386-87, 565 N.W.2d 256-57. By substantial evidence, we refer to relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14212 - 2014-09-15
to support them. Id. at 386-87, 565 N.W.2d 256-57. By substantial evidence, we refer to relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14212 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kimberly Kay Arneson v. Robert Eric Arneson
deference in resolving the ambiguity. Id. at 805-08, 535 N.W.2d at 118-20. Further, if a reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12955 - 2017-09-21
deference in resolving the ambiguity. Id. at 805-08, 535 N.W.2d at 118-20. Further, if a reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12955 - 2017-09-21