Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32591 - 32600 of 39159 for c's.
Search results 32591 - 32600 of 39159 for c's.
Robert Ruffer v. Town of Monroe - Board of Review
] Section 70.85(4)(c), Stats., provides that an appeal of the DOR’s determination shall be by certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12505 - 2005-03-31
] Section 70.85(4)(c), Stats., provides that an appeal of the DOR’s determination shall be by certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12505 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard P. Gilliland
c. lamelas, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25917 - 2006-08-29
c. lamelas, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25917 - 2006-08-29
State v. Michael W. Carlson
, as a repeater, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225(2)(a) and 939.62(1)(c).[1] He contends that one of the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3895 - 2005-03-31
, as a repeater, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225(2)(a) and 939.62(1)(c).[1] He contends that one of the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3895 - 2005-03-31
John G. Kierstyn v. Racine Unified School District
. Among his job duties was the obligation to “[c]ommunicate general benefit information to employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12553 - 2005-03-31
. Among his job duties was the obligation to “[c]ommunicate general benefit information to employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12553 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
[-]rated movie” and that “[c]ontroversies of this kind are to be settled in the courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36243 - 2009-04-20
[-]rated movie” and that “[c]ontroversies of this kind are to be settled in the courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36243 - 2009-04-20
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s determination is affirmed. C. Inclusion of Debts/Assets and Property Division. ¶15 Ibraheem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31459 - 2008-01-14
court’s determination is affirmed. C. Inclusion of Debts/Assets and Property Division. ¶15 Ibraheem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31459 - 2008-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
an innocent person borders on the frivolous. C. Mistrial. ¶17 Laster claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94655 - 2013-04-01
an innocent person borders on the frivolous. C. Mistrial. ¶17 Laster claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94655 - 2013-04-01
State v. Kenneth Boivin
to a crime as a repeater, contrary to §§ 940.02(1), 939.05, 939.62(1)(c), Stats., and an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11721 - 2005-03-31
to a crime as a repeater, contrary to §§ 940.02(1), 939.05, 939.62(1)(c), Stats., and an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11721 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Jones to the stand. C. Christopher Blunt/Corey Moore ¶20 Jenkins believed that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91549 - 2013-01-14
Jones to the stand. C. Christopher Blunt/Corey Moore ¶20 Jenkins believed that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91549 - 2013-01-14
2006 WI APP 215
of the marriage. (b) The property brought to the marriage by each party. (c) Whether one of the parties has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26454 - 2006-10-30
of the marriage. (b) The property brought to the marriage by each party. (c) Whether one of the parties has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26454 - 2006-10-30