Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32591 - 32600 of 62001 for child support.

[PDF] State v. Door County Board of Adjustment
, nonarbitrary, noncapricious, within the board’s jurisdiction, and supported by the evidence. See Snyder v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13279 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Lorenzo S. Balli
presented in the complaint did not support a charge of attempted escape because they did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3181 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Chris R. Howard
within the past five years to support the repeater allegation. Even if that were true, 1 however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3788 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Philip J. Traynor v. Wayne T. Cook, Sr.
Traynor worked on the roof. These findings are amply supported by the record. Lastly, the Cooks ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10775 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
to argue caselaw to support his request and he request time which was credited to another case, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96330 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
into viable and fact-supported legal theories.” State v. Jackson, 229 Wis. 2d 328, 337
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252918 - 2020-01-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, we must assume that the missing material supports the trial court’s ruling.’” State v. McAttee
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20

State v. Phillip E. Bacon
are not sufficiently supported by facts. See State v. Saunders, 196 Wis.2d 45, 49, 538 N.W.2d 546, 548 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10011 - 2005-03-31

Robert P. Stupar and Terry L. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
and the evidence supports its findings, we affirm the judgment. The trial court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10205 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of fact,” but we do not rely on “any finding of fact that is not supported by substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804282 - 2024-05-22