Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32591 - 32600 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 32591 - 32600 of 63981 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we are satisfied that the appeal has no merit. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202611 - 2017-11-27
of the report and an independent review of the record, we are satisfied that the appeal has no merit. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202611 - 2017-11-27
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
not challenge this history. Instead, he appears to be arguing that he had no prior convictions on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
not challenge this history. Instead, he appears to be arguing that he had no prior convictions on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
State v. Wua Xiong
on the victim, and Xiong’s record of committing prior, serious offenses, and his failure to benefit from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13036 - 2005-03-31
on the victim, and Xiong’s record of committing prior, serious offenses, and his failure to benefit from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13036 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152324 - 2017-09-21
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152324 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141636 - 2015-05-10
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141636 - 2015-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
These factors “include, but are not limited to: 1. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78867 - 2014-09-15
These factors “include, but are not limited to: 1. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78867 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Nanci Brisbane v. Peter J. Vallecillo
there had been no record of actual physical abuse, there was the flower pot incident, “which might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4417 - 2017-09-19
there had been no record of actual physical abuse, there was the flower pot incident, “which might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4417 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93206 - 2014-09-15
review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93206 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2012AP923-CRNM 2 record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102040 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2012AP923-CRNM 2 record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102040 - 2017-09-21
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Joshua J. Minich
of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. See Burkes v. Hales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21442 - 2006-02-15
of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. See Burkes v. Hales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21442 - 2006-02-15