Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3261 - 3270 of 25691 for bench warrant/1000.

State v. Lee Raven
of the store, his son and a pharmacy technician—testified for the State at the bench trial about the incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25262 - 2006-05-24

COURT OF APPEALS
a money judgment entered following a bench trial at which the circuit court determined the Bank wrongfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98744 - 2013-06-27

Gregory T. Isermann v. Elizabeth A. Isermann
, Judge Dreyfus issued a well-reasoned and thorough bench decision with which we fully agree. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6144 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of force. Felton opted for a bench trial. Both Rodriguez and Linder agreed to testify against Felton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95802 - 2013-04-22

[PDF] State v. Willie C. Simpson
of conviction entered after a bench trial where he was found guilty of two counts of first-degree sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4322 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at issue to Dimmick for illegally operating an ATV or UTV on a highway. At the subsequent bench trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=900801 - 2025-01-14

[PDF] Gregory T. Isermann v. Elizabeth A. Isermann
bench decision with which we fully agree. ¶14 To determine whether claim preclusion bars an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6144 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a small claims court bench trial. Hunt argues the court erred by failing to award him approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237883 - 2019-03-26

[PDF] State v. Lee Raven
and a pharmacy technician—testified for the State at the bench trial about the incident. During her own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25262 - 2017-09-21

Michael F. Hupy & Associates v. Michael T. Savaglio
& Associates, S.C., appeals from an “Order for Judgment” confirming an earlier oral decision, after a bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5002 - 2005-03-31