Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3261 - 3270 of 5316 for text.

[PDF] WI App 35
633, 681 N.W.2d 110). When interpreting a statute, our analysis begins with the statutory text
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354164 - 2021-06-14

[PDF] WI 87
of the text of the Order for Dismissal. ¶80 The court of appeals and the majority opinion can be read
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84732 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
, 1203 (11th Cir. 1983) (same). The text of the Wisconsin rule, however, plainly requires
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116774 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
to the amended rule); United States v. Ceballos, 706 F.2d 1198, 1203 (11th Cir. 1983) (same). The text
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116774 - 2014-07-09

[PDF] WI 48
, 686, 173 N.W.2d 627 (1970), the text of Wis. Stat. § 70.32(1) lists three sources of information
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373138 - 2021-07-21

[PDF] WI 7
of the request for an administrative hearing . . . ." ¶12 Adhering to the text of Wis. Stat. §§ 48.72
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91482 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 38
conviction in Virginia. ¶21 But Moran’s logic does not follow from WIS. STAT. § 941.29(5)’s text
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242033 - 2019-08-13

[PDF] State v. Jason J. Trawitzki
at 751. Context is defined as "[t]he part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17543 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
The majority opinion's analysis of Wis. Stat. § 108.04(5g)(a)2. significantly strays from the statutory text
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189937 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a text message to Hatcher with Edwards’ address on the day of the murder along with a message that read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910575 - 2025-02-04