Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3261 - 3270 of 20925 for word.
Search results 3261 - 3270 of 20925 for word.
Frontsheet
is given its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99475 - 2013-07-15
is given its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99475 - 2013-07-15
[PDF]
WI 76
words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning." Kalal, 271 Wis. 2d 633
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99475 - 2014-09-15
words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning." Kalal, 271 Wis. 2d 633
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99475 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. DOT, 2002 WI App 59, ¶38, 252 Wis. 2d 191, 642 N.W.2d 600). In other words, the property owner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99492 - 2017-09-21
. DOT, 2002 WI App 59, ¶38, 252 Wis. 2d 191, 642 N.W.2d 600). In other words, the property owner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99492 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ralph Ovadal
connotation of the word. ¶22 As indicated above, this court adopts as its own the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15840 - 2005-03-31
connotation of the word. ¶22 As indicated above, this court adopts as its own the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15840 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
is clear and unambiguous, we may not look beyond the plain words of the statute in question to ascertain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6785 - 2005-03-31
is clear and unambiguous, we may not look beyond the plain words of the statute in question to ascertain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6785 - 2005-03-31
Janet L. Fry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. An unreasonable interpretation of a statute is one that directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2305 - 2005-03-31
. An unreasonable interpretation of a statute is one that directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2305 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Indeed, the word “immediately” does not even appear in the statute. Elsewhere in WIS. STAT. ch. 48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194404 - 2017-09-21
.” Indeed, the word “immediately” does not even appear in the statute. Elsewhere in WIS. STAT. ch. 48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194404 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
, we may not look beyond the plain words of the statute in question to ascertain its meaning. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6785 - 2017-09-20
, we may not look beyond the plain words of the statute in question to ascertain its meaning. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6785 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
they make up their own version and mix my words up. No. 2024AP419-CR 6 ¶10 The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905443 - 2025-01-24
they make up their own version and mix my words up. No. 2024AP419-CR 6 ¶10 The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905443 - 2025-01-24
Federal Insurance Company v. Grunau Project Development, Inc.
In other words, the work on the project was proceeding exactly according to the standard industry contracts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25384 - 2006-08-29
In other words, the work on the project was proceeding exactly according to the standard industry contracts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25384 - 2006-08-29