Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3261 - 3270 of 7561 for ye.
Search results 3261 - 3270 of 7561 for ye.
COURT OF APPEALS
: Q: Did you have contact with Mr. Ward on July 5, 2006? A: Yes. Q: How did that contact come about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35789 - 2009-03-09
: Q: Did you have contact with Mr. Ward on July 5, 2006? A: Yes. Q: How did that contact come about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35789 - 2009-03-09
[PDF]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Yes. FACTS The U.S. Supreme Court on June 26, 2015, ruled that the 14 th Amendment
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146878 - 2017-09-21
Yes. FACTS The U.S. Supreme Court on June 26, 2015, ruled that the 14 th Amendment
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146878 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeremy J. Hanson
“yes” to both questions. The court then accepted Hanson’s plea, found him guilty of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16265 - 2005-03-31
“yes” to both questions. The court then accepted Hanson’s plea, found him guilty of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16265 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
thing? THE WITNESS: Yes. ¶5 At this point, the circuit court stopped the hearing and denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96325 - 2013-05-06
thing? THE WITNESS: Yes. ¶5 At this point, the circuit court stopped the hearing and denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96325 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
?” Howard responded, “Yes.” The court also asked Howard whether he understood that the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85771 - 2014-09-15
?” Howard responded, “Yes.” The court also asked Howard whether he understood that the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85771 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lonnie J. Kvapil
on something that you know from outside the courtroom? [MS.] PORTER: Yes. THE COURT: Okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12315 - 2017-09-21
on something that you know from outside the courtroom? [MS.] PORTER: Yes. THE COURT: Okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12315 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mardelle E. Triggs
chemical test of your blood, yes or no?”, Triggs asked the officer twice what that question meant “in lay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7534 - 2005-03-31
chemical test of your blood, yes or no?”, Triggs asked the officer twice what that question meant “in lay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7534 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the jurors individually and each confirmed that they answered “yes” to the question of whether Broeders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98008 - 2014-09-15
the jurors individually and each confirmed that they answered “yes” to the question of whether Broeders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98008 - 2014-09-15
State v. James Zamitalo
that the defendant was not given the opportunity to have an alternate test taken, is that correct? JENSEN: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10818 - 2005-03-31
that the defendant was not given the opportunity to have an alternate test taken, is that correct? JENSEN: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10818 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
want to be considered for SOT at this time?” to which Patrick responded: “Yes, even though I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39221 - 2009-08-10
want to be considered for SOT at this time?” to which Patrick responded: “Yes, even though I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39221 - 2009-08-10