Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32601 - 32610 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 32601 - 32610 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Jeffrey R. Groth
postconviction motion for a new trial on the homicide charge. The State contends that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4574 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion for a new trial on the homicide charge. The State contends that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4574 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court granted the Village Board’s motion to dismiss Tharp’s mandamus claim, and, later, granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725474 - 2023-11-07
The circuit court granted the Village Board’s motion to dismiss Tharp’s mandamus claim, and, later, granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725474 - 2023-11-07
[PDF]
Frontsheet
for additional findings; and determine and impose appropriate discipline. The court, on its own motion, may
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183165 - 2017-09-21
for additional findings; and determine and impose appropriate discipline. The court, on its own motion, may
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183165 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frederick L. Howell
. 1 Judge Laurence C. Gram presided over Howell’s motion to suppress; Judge Lamelas presided over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2800 - 2017-09-19
. 1 Judge Laurence C. Gram presided over Howell’s motion to suppress; Judge Lamelas presided over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2800 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the order denying his motion to vacate or reconsider the court’s sanction order. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143485 - 2015-06-24
the order denying his motion to vacate or reconsider the court’s sanction order. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143485 - 2015-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 940.02(1) and 939.05 (2011-12).[1] He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125349 - 2014-10-27
. §§ 940.02(1) and 939.05 (2011-12).[1] He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125349 - 2014-10-27
State v. Frederick L. Howell
), Howell argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the handgun discovered in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2800 - 2005-03-31
), Howell argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the handgun discovered in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2800 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the parties’ motions in limine; (10) the court’s denial of Vanidestine’s motion to sever the charges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643518 - 2023-04-11
on the parties’ motions in limine; (10) the court’s denial of Vanidestine’s motion to sever the charges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643518 - 2023-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pornography and an order of the trial court denying his postconviction motion, without a hearing.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816042 - 2024-06-25
pornography and an order of the trial court denying his postconviction motion, without a hearing.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816042 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
WI App 42
filed a motion for a temporary injunction, which the circuit court denied. ¶9 On July 27, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682775 - 2023-09-21
filed a motion for a temporary injunction, which the circuit court denied. ¶9 On July 27, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682775 - 2023-09-21