Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32601 - 32610 of 46102 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 32601 - 32610 of 46102 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38611 - 2009-07-29
is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38611 - 2009-07-29
CA Blank Order
complaint described additional evidence, but that is not the test. We have found nothing in the applicable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121061 - 2014-09-02
complaint described additional evidence, but that is not the test. We have found nothing in the applicable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121061 - 2014-09-02
State v. Michael E. Williams
the appropriateness of submitting a lesser-included offense, the reviewing court must apply a two-step test. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11062 - 2005-03-31
the appropriateness of submitting a lesser-included offense, the reviewing court must apply a two-step test. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11062 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard Dakota
of reasonableness." Id. at 688. With respect to prejudice, the test is whether "counsel's errors were so serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13706 - 2005-03-31
of reasonableness." Id. at 688. With respect to prejudice, the test is whether "counsel's errors were so serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13706 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: the five ‘w’s’ and one ‘h’ test, ‘that is, who, what, where, when, why, and how. A motion that alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98788 - 2013-07-01
: the five ‘w’s’ and one ‘h’ test, ‘that is, who, what, where, when, why, and how. A motion that alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98788 - 2013-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Gudgeon, 2006 WI App 143, ¶20, 295 Wis. 2d 189, 720 N.W.2d 114. The objective bias test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94944 - 2013-04-09
.” State v. Gudgeon, 2006 WI App 143, ¶20, 295 Wis. 2d 189, 720 N.W.2d 114. The objective bias test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94944 - 2013-04-09
State v. Roy J. Jones
). If the newly discovered evidence fails to meet any one of these tests, the defendant is not entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20700 - 2005-12-19
). If the newly discovered evidence fails to meet any one of these tests, the defendant is not entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20700 - 2005-12-19
State v. Ray Lee Wimer
App 142, ¶21, 237 Wis. 2d 558, 614 N.W.2d 543. ¶11 Wimer fails both these tests. Wimer does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4416 - 2005-03-31
App 142, ¶21, 237 Wis. 2d 558, 614 N.W.2d 543. ¶11 Wimer fails both these tests. Wimer does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4416 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tommie Thames
. State v. Hirsch, 140 Wis.2d 468, 471, 410 N.W.2d 638, 639 (Ct. App. 1987). We apply a two-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10041 - 2005-03-31
. State v. Hirsch, 140 Wis.2d 468, 471, 410 N.W.2d 638, 639 (Ct. App. 1987). We apply a two-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10041 - 2005-03-31
City of Delavan v. Roger Sterken
granted the motion. Id., ¶7. Carter made clear that the proper test was whether a trial occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20368 - 2005-11-22
granted the motion. Id., ¶7. Carter made clear that the proper test was whether a trial occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20368 - 2005-11-22