Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32601 - 32610 of 38489 for t's.

State v. James L. Kurtz
, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 (1981). The standard is one of reasonableness, and “[t]he essential question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20149 - 2005-11-09

COURT OF APPEALS
that did not fit the testimony. “[T]he choice among competing reasonable inferences is for the [circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28

State v. Robert Simmons
, 139‑40, 456 N.W.2d 830 (1990). Stated otherwise, to justify an investigatory stop, “[t]he police must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7353 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
. at 434-35 (brackets and citation omitted). Further, “[t]he trier of fact determines issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98463 - 2013-06-19

COURT OF APPEALS
: They got to my head. Dassey asserts that the comments “not really” and “[t]hey got to my head” amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92079 - 2013-01-29

James Grafft v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
the “undeveloped shoreline” standard of § NR 326.055(4)(f). ¶10 Looking to the history of the statute, “[i]t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2103 - 2005-03-31

The Estate of Robert Murray v. The Travelers Insurance Company
concluded, “[I]t is clear under the facts of this case that the conduct of Lange was directly connected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13653 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. The stipulation at issue provided: [T]he defense in this case and the State of Wisconsin have stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28567 - 2007-03-26

Jerome A. Beatty v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
to vigorously enforcing its Sexual Harassment Policies at all levels of [t]he Company. [4] An agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14114 - 2005-03-31

Odis Purifoy v. Ron Malone
§ PAC 1.07(5)(c), states that when parole has been granted and later denied: [T]he inmate shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4244 - 2005-03-31