Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32621 - 32630 of 59310 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 32621 - 32630 of 59310 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
John W. Sweeney, Sr. v. Catherine Farrey
time and mandatory release, and protected liberty interests. He further claims he should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25020 - 2017-09-21
time and mandatory release, and protected liberty interests. He further claims he should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25020 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nathan J. Pettigrew
that Pettigrew is simply repeating claims he has previously raised, and asks the court to consider imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20106 - 2007-06-04
that Pettigrew is simply repeating claims he has previously raised, and asks the court to consider imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20106 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
is barred from raising this claim. ¶3 Gray next argues that the State used a falsified petition to waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45827 - 2014-09-15
is barred from raising this claim. ¶3 Gray next argues that the State used a falsified petition to waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45827 - 2014-09-15
Edward A. Faas v. Ervin H. Nuttelman, Jr.
this action to establish their claim to the route over the cornfield and barnyard, and the trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5137 - 2005-03-31
this action to establish their claim to the route over the cornfield and barnyard, and the trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richard Wanta v. Frederick C. Mueller
misrepresentation and that the evidence would not support a negligent misrepresentation claim. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14848 - 2017-09-21
misrepresentation and that the evidence would not support a negligent misrepresentation claim. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14848 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert Daniel Ryan
appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Ryan claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9023 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Ryan claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9023 - 2005-03-31
State v. David C. Haubrich
, see Wis. Stat. § 961.573(1). He claims that the trial court erred in not granting his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2198 - 2005-03-31
, see Wis. Stat. § 961.573(1). He claims that the trial court erred in not granting his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2198 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
from raising this claim. ¶3 Gray next argues that the State used a falsified petition to waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45827 - 2010-01-19
from raising this claim. ¶3 Gray next argues that the State used a falsified petition to waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45827 - 2010-01-19
Lawrence McCoy v. David Schwarz
not adequately consider alternatives to revocation. The record undermines his claim. The record shows that DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18194 - 2005-05-18
not adequately consider alternatives to revocation. The record undermines his claim. The record shows that DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18194 - 2005-05-18
CA Blank Order
. Sanders’ main claim is that his sentence, commensurate with that of a Class C felony, was too harsh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91341 - 2013-01-08
. Sanders’ main claim is that his sentence, commensurate with that of a Class C felony, was too harsh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91341 - 2013-01-08