Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32621 - 32630 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 32621 - 32630 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
John W. Sweeney, Sr. v. Catherine Farrey
interests. He further claims he should have received sentence credit on his reconfinement for the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25020 - 2006-05-03
interests. He further claims he should have received sentence credit on his reconfinement for the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25020 - 2006-05-03
State v. Thomas J. Stamper
assistance of counsel claim. There was no question that Stamper was heavily intoxicated at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2442 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel claim. There was no question that Stamper was heavily intoxicated at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2442 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randy J. Stahl
an insurance claim and, if he did, Kroner would be ethically compelled to report his confession to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6940 - 2005-03-31
an insurance claim and, if he did, Kroner would be ethically compelled to report his confession to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6940 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Sanjak against Evelio Duarte-Vestar in which Sanjak claims that Duarte-Vestar failed to pay rent when due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32462 - 2008-04-16
Sanjak against Evelio Duarte-Vestar in which Sanjak claims that Duarte-Vestar failed to pay rent when due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32462 - 2008-04-16
State v. Michael Davis
assistance claim. Further, nothing in the record supports Davis' apparent claim that trial counsel should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9743 - 2005-03-31
assistance claim. Further, nothing in the record supports Davis' apparent claim that trial counsel should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bruce Townsend v. Peter Glashauser
predecessors in title should have known that the Townsends claimed the property as their own. ¶5 Contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20933 - 2017-09-21
predecessors in title should have known that the Townsends claimed the property as their own. ¶5 Contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20933 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nathan J. Pettigrew
that Pettigrew is simply repeating claims he has previously raised, and asks the court to consider imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20106 - 2007-06-04
that Pettigrew is simply repeating claims he has previously raised, and asks the court to consider imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20106 - 2007-06-04
State v. David C. Haubrich
, see Wis. Stat. § 961.573(1). He claims that the trial court erred in not granting his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2198 - 2005-03-31
, see Wis. Stat. § 961.573(1). He claims that the trial court erred in not granting his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Edward A. Faas v. Ervin H. Nuttelman, Jr.
of the easement. The Faases initiated this action to establish their claim to the route over the cornfield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5137 - 2017-09-19
of the easement. The Faases initiated this action to establish their claim to the route over the cornfield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5137 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. McManus
or her claim. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 313-14, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). ¶3 On appeal, McManus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4429 - 2017-09-19
or her claim. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 313-14, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). ¶3 On appeal, McManus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4429 - 2017-09-19