Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32621 - 32630 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 32621 - 32630 of 64042 for records/1000.
State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
that his counsel did not inform him of his right to testify finds no support in the record and provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13453 - 2005-03-31
that his counsel did not inform him of his right to testify finds no support in the record and provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13453 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John D. Mascaretti
that the parties had stipulated to the prior convictions. The record supports this assertion. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15614 - 2017-09-21
that the parties had stipulated to the prior convictions. The record supports this assertion. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15614 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Nelson
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10288 - 2017-09-20
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10288 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s history of undesirable behavior pattern, 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78867 - 2012-03-06
. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s history of undesirable behavior pattern, 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78867 - 2012-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812059 - 2024-06-11
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812059 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, counsel’s report, and Lynch’s response, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720749 - 2023-11-01
the record, counsel’s report, and Lynch’s response, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720749 - 2023-11-01
State v. Connell Marshall
—without supporting evidence in the record—that the victim recanted her accusations because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11002 - 2005-03-31
—without supporting evidence in the record—that the victim recanted her accusations because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11002 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91639 - 2014-09-15
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91639 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
remanded the record to the circuit court, which denied Scheel’s postconviction motion after a Machner[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133334 - 2015-01-21
remanded the record to the circuit court, which denied Scheel’s postconviction motion after a Machner[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133334 - 2015-01-21
State v. James R. Brownson
on Brownson's record involved consumer fraud relating to construction practices. He related Brownson's scheme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9148 - 2005-03-31
on Brownson's record involved consumer fraud relating to construction practices. He related Brownson's scheme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9148 - 2005-03-31