Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32631 - 32640 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 32631 - 32640 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental postconviction motion in order to address the DNA issue. Because a no-merit report is only
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207591 - 2018-01-23
a supplemental postconviction motion in order to address the DNA issue. Because a no-merit report is only
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207591 - 2018-01-23
Mark A. Flood v. Robert A. Benkoski
of the circuit court that denied his motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff Mark A. Flood’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16085 - 2005-10-16
of the circuit court that denied his motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff Mark A. Flood’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16085 - 2005-10-16
Janice E. Rutan v. Sandra Kay Miller
on Miller’s and Rutan’s cross-motions for an extension of time within which to file an answer, to strike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12128 - 2005-03-31
on Miller’s and Rutan’s cross-motions for an extension of time within which to file an answer, to strike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12128 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that denied his motion. ¶2 I conclude that Rangel is not entitled to an award of costs and attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944763 - 2025-04-24
that denied his motion. ¶2 I conclude that Rangel is not entitled to an award of costs and attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944763 - 2025-04-24
Catharine M. Lawton v. Town of Barton
meetings law, and an order denying her motion for reconsideration. We hold that a judgment by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7364 - 2005-03-31
meetings law, and an order denying her motion for reconsideration. We hold that a judgment by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7364 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
their taking. In pre-trial motions in limine, Forbes sought to exclude testimony from the DOT’s expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120484 - 2014-08-27
their taking. In pre-trial motions in limine, Forbes sought to exclude testimony from the DOT’s expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120484 - 2014-08-27
State v. Faisal Smith
denying his motion for re-sentencing. Smith argues: (1) the trial court erred in concluding that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13005 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for re-sentencing. Smith argues: (1) the trial court erred in concluding that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13005 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Donald Leiser, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111905 - 2014-05-12
PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Donald Leiser, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111905 - 2014-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
Nissenbaum also claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28466 - 2007-03-19
Nissenbaum also claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28466 - 2007-03-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
-CR 2 denying his motion to suppress evidence and his motion for reconsideration because, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29819 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 denying his motion to suppress evidence and his motion for reconsideration because, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29819 - 2014-09-15