Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32631 - 32640 of 58253 for speedy trial.
Search results 32631 - 32640 of 58253 for speedy trial.
State v. Joseph L. Kohls
interfering with the trial court's sentencing discretion. See State v. Mosley, 201 Wis. 2d 36, 43, 547 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31
interfering with the trial court's sentencing discretion. See State v. Mosley, 201 Wis. 2d 36, 43, 547 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Laurie J. Malone
Imposed By The Trial Court Was Unlawful” and, in its entirety, states: The penalty for the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16171 - 2017-09-21
Imposed By The Trial Court Was Unlawful” and, in its entirety, states: The penalty for the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16171 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy G. Tackett
March 16, 2000. We affirm the trial court’s order. No. 02-0195 2 ¶2 Tackett was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4859 - 2017-09-19
March 16, 2000. We affirm the trial court’s order. No. 02-0195 2 ¶2 Tackett was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4859 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial based on prosecutorial misconduct and fraud on the court, which he claimed was shown by newly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523321 - 2022-05-24
trial based on prosecutorial misconduct and fraud on the court, which he claimed was shown by newly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523321 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Thomas
the judgment. The trial court made the following findings of the essential, undisputed facts: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12142 - 2017-09-21
the judgment. The trial court made the following findings of the essential, undisputed facts: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12142 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial because the State knowingly used perjured testimony to convict him, and he did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30952 - 2007-11-20
to a new trial because the State knowingly used perjured testimony to convict him, and he did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30952 - 2007-11-20
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. Garlock
., to challenge the proposed revocation. The trial court determined after the hearing that Garlock's operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8423 - 2017-09-19
., to challenge the proposed revocation. The trial court determined after the hearing that Garlock's operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8423 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
At the postconviction motion hearing, Scott’s trial counsel, Jonathan LaVoy, testified that in the course of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95062 - 2013-04-09
At the postconviction motion hearing, Scott’s trial counsel, Jonathan LaVoy, testified that in the course of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95062 - 2013-04-09
[PDF]
State v. Gregory J. Crapp
appeals from a judgment of conviction resulting from a jury trial in which he was found guilty of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9772 - 2017-09-19
appeals from a judgment of conviction resulting from a jury trial in which he was found guilty of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9772 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Daniel J.R. LaCount v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
$500,000 per occurrence limit of liability. The trial court concluded that paragraph (a) of the omnibus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7111 - 2017-09-20
$500,000 per occurrence limit of liability. The trial court concluded that paragraph (a) of the omnibus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7111 - 2017-09-20