Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32641 - 32650 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] Intervenors’ Nathan Atkinson, Stephen Joseph Wright, Gary Krenz, Sarah J. Hamilton, Jean-Luc Thiffeault, Somesh Jha, Joanne Kane and Leah Dudley Response to Motion to Dismiss
claims were purportedly precluded and barred. But now that the Court has granted the Petition, a motion
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1031intervenorsmotiontodismiss.pdf - 2023-10-31

[PDF] State v. Todd M. Beyersdorf
of the conversation was admitted at trial. ¶4 Beyersdorf claims that trial counsel was ineffective for not arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14921 - 2017-09-21

State v. Arden Krueger
filed postconviction motions and claimed ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2542 - 2005-03-31

Paul Kelnhofer v. Village of Ephraim
claims exempted it from wetlands controls and related conditional use permits. Municipalities have broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8163 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
a response renewing his postconviction claim that his sentence was unduly harsh and based upon false
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110282 - 2014-04-09

State v. Troy J. Olmsted
on McDaniel’s intent to enter a plea, Olmsted decided to do so as well. He claimed that in fact McDaniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7108 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jesse J. Madison
Madison first claims that he has a statutory right to a special verdict under Wis. Stat. § 805.12(1). See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5902 - 2005-03-31

State v. Willard E. Lott
.2d 274 (1997), for the answer to most of Lott’s complaints. In that case, Voss claimed several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14003 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas E. Richmond
denying his postconviction motion. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19

State v. James A. Cundy
N.W.2d 794 (Ct. App. 1989). ¶5 Cundy’s claim is that portions of Gitter’s trial testimony were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4160 - 2005-03-31