Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32651 - 32660 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 32651 - 32660 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
and unknowing and that his trial and appellate attorneys were ineffective for not challenging his plea based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79043 - 2012-03-05
and unknowing and that his trial and appellate attorneys were ineffective for not challenging his plea based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79043 - 2012-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial counsel was constitutionally defective for failing to object to the breach. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182419 - 2017-09-21
trial counsel was constitutionally defective for failing to object to the breach. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182419 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Schweiner
and argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing an unduly harsh sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7515 - 2017-09-19
and argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing an unduly harsh sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7515 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher N. Pflieger
relief. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when it imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6921 - 2005-03-31
relief. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when it imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6921 - 2005-03-31
R & L Transfer, Inc. v. Charles Bickford and Cleva Bickford
Charles and Cleva Bickford’s names at the top. The trial court concluded that R&L had been misled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2268 - 2005-03-31
Charles and Cleva Bickford’s names at the top. The trial court concluded that R&L had been misled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2268 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene Thomas
Thomas’ rights, we affirm the judgment. The trial court made the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12142 - 2005-03-31
Thomas’ rights, we affirm the judgment. The trial court made the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12142 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nora A. Cadotte
the officer’s actions were justified under the community caretaker function, but the trial court disagreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7210 - 2017-09-20
the officer’s actions were justified under the community caretaker function, but the trial court disagreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7210 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
concentration (PAC), fifth offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b) (2007- 08).1 He contends the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35761 - 2014-09-15
concentration (PAC), fifth offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b) (2007- 08).1 He contends the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35761 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 346.63(1)(b) (2007-08).[1] He contends the trial court erroneously denied his motion to collaterally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35761 - 2009-03-10
. § 346.63(1)(b) (2007-08).[1] He contends the trial court erroneously denied his motion to collaterally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35761 - 2009-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a firearm while running from police. At trial, the State introduced testimony showing the following facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134027 - 2017-09-21
a firearm while running from police. At trial, the State introduced testimony showing the following facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134027 - 2017-09-21