Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32661 - 32670 of 41998 for jury duty/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
In 1999, Halda was convicted following a jury trial of first-degree intentional homicide while using
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442352 - 2021-10-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
In 1997, a jury convicted Gursky of nine offenses. His attorney filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185260 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
away. The jury found Marx guilty. The circuit court sentenced Marx to eighty days in jail
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605765 - 2022-12-29

[PDF] State v. Torey U. Jennings
that Jennings understood and waived his rights to a jury trial. The court also inquired whether Jennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12974 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
., Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. Nathaniel Cathey appeals a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134438 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
affirm. ¶2 A jury found Williams guilty of two armed robberies, in violation of Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27193 - 2006-11-20

Dale L. Knafelc v. Prosource Properties, Ltd.
the least onerous definition of a “new roof.” It is the jury’s function to determine the parties’ intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6694 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
surcharge, we reject the no-merit report. A jury found Forney guilty of two felonies: (1) first-degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162343 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kristen Marsh
to a unanimous jury. This rule applies even when the legislature enacts a more specific statute. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14700 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
). The Poellinger test applies to bench trials as well as jury trials. See State v. Oppermann, 156 Wis. 2d 241
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30826 - 2014-09-15