Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32671 - 32680 of 97687 for court records search online.
Search results 32671 - 32680 of 97687 for court records search online.
Waushara County v. Clinton L. Duhm
the circuit court’s order because the record contains no affidavit or other evidence which sets forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4530 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court’s order because the record contains no affidavit or other evidence which sets forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4530 - 2005-03-31
Waushara County v. Clinton L. Duhm
the circuit court’s order because the record contains no affidavit or other evidence which sets forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4531 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court’s order because the record contains no affidavit or other evidence which sets forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4531 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Burnett County Department of Human Services v. Tera L. R.
the final hearing.” The court then stated, “[w]e will go off the record in just a moment while we set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20348 - 2017-09-21
the final hearing.” The court then stated, “[w]e will go off the record in just a moment while we set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20348 - 2017-09-21
Waushara County v. Clinton L. Duhm
the circuit court’s order because the record contains no affidavit or other evidence which sets forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4529 - 2006-08-29
the circuit court’s order because the record contains no affidavit or other evidence which sets forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4529 - 2006-08-29
State v. Paul M. Way
by imposing the sentence and that the court was biased against him. Because the record does not support Way’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13868 - 2005-03-31
by imposing the sentence and that the court was biased against him. Because the record does not support Way’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13868 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to eliminate the need for the court to make a record demonstrating the defendant’s understanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149613 - 2017-09-21
to eliminate the need for the court to make a record demonstrating the defendant’s understanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149613 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul M. Way
to the record to determine if the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. See State v. Smith, 100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13868 - 2014-09-15
to the record to determine if the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. See State v. Smith, 100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13868 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE
. Specifically, the Court should consider amending provision (a) of 801.18(9) OFFICIAL RECORD to accurately
/supreme/docs/1403commentsgirdner.pdf - 2016-01-22
. Specifically, the Court should consider amending provision (a) of 801.18(9) OFFICIAL RECORD to accurately
/supreme/docs/1403commentsgirdner.pdf - 2016-01-22
State v. David Sautier
require resentencing. He complains that the trial court considered his prior record which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31
require resentencing. He complains that the trial court considered his prior record which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
conclude that the record supports the court’s property division as a proper exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58827 - 2014-09-15
conclude that the record supports the court’s property division as a proper exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58827 - 2014-09-15